"What is our energy future?"

see more ideas like this.

Nuclear Power Confronts Scarce Water

by Assignment Earth | 7:02 pm April 2nd, 2010 | 2 Comments »
Categories: Nuclear
Tags:

In Utah, a proposed nuclear power plant would depend on huge amounts of water from the Green River, raising questions about the capacity of the river to support this new development and other claims to its shrinking supply.

Vote:
Tell your friends:

2 Responses to “Nuclear Power Confronts Scarce Water”


  1. Water and Improved Nuclear Energy

    Existing nuclear reactors often use large amounts of water and often feature the characteristic shaped cooling towers that cool the water traditional LWR reactors need to remove heat from the reactor core. Unfortunately water is not infrequently a scarce resource in many communities around the Country. What may not be widely known is the fact that the requirement for significant amounts of cooling water is not unique to nuclear reactors but applies equally to Solar Thermal, Natural Gas, and Coal Fired Power Plants. The requirement for cooling water is primarily the result of the power turbine that is common to all of these power generation technologies and is used to transform heat energy into electrical energy.

    To achieve good thermodynamic efficiency and to efficiently produce electrical power it is typically necessary to cool the outlet leg of nuclear, solar thermal, natural gas, and coal fired power plant turbines. The need for cooling water is essentially equal in all of these power generation technologies and is not greater for nuclear energy relative to Solar Thermal or any of the other competitive technologies on a per Megawatt of electrical power output basis. If a nuclear reactor and a Solar Thermal power plant both produce 100 MWatts of electrical power they will both have essentially the same demand for cooling water because they both are using a common technology turbine-generator which has equivalent requirement for cooling the outlet leg of the turbine to achieve good power conversion efficiencies. Locating adequate amounts of cooling water is a vital requirement for plans for not only nuclear but also solar thermal, natural gas, and coal fired power plants, all which use turbine generators to finally convert heat into electricity. Power plant projects for all of these technologies sometimes have to be put on hold because it is not possible to provide both the water needed for communities and agriculture as well as sufficient cooling water for energy production.

    We really can build better nuclear plants [1] that make less nuclear waste and require less cooling water. This nuclear technology is not new and was proven to work at Oak Ridge National Laboratory 40 years ago. This technology is called a Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR) and it burns much more abundant Thorium nuclear fuel. ORNL built and operated a successful LFTR prototype reactor between 1965 and 1969. This technology is superior to conventionally deployed Light Water Reactor nuclear technology used in the United States and produces in excess of 100 times less nuclear waste [2] and can be built to not require any cooling water (condenser dry cooling) which helps preserve precious water resources.

    Liquid Fluoride Molten Salt Reactors (LFTRs) tend to operate at higher temperatures and because of this can be built to not require any water for cooling the core (the molten salt is a very effective and safe core coolant that has good safety promoting properties like carrying away large amounts of heat without boiling or producing high pressures inside the reactor – even under extreme circumstances and during high temperature events). Like modern submarines, LFTRs can use closed Brayton cycle turbine machinery where no steam is released into the environment while the turbine transforms the heat produced in the fluid fueled nuclear reactor into electricity. For reactors like LFTR that can safely operate at high temperature (~800 degrees C) air cooled condensers can dissipate all of the heat pr


  2. LFTR that can safely operate at high temperature (~800 degrees C) air cooled condensers can dissipate all of the heat produced by higher temperature molten salt reactors and no steam or cooling towers are required and no steam, etc. is released. Molten Salt reactors can be sited in the middle of deserts if desired far away from water and still transform heat into electricity while using only condenser air cooling at 40%+ estimated efficiency versus ~33% efficiency for traditional low temperature water cooled LWRs or current Solar Thermal plants [3]. Ready access to large amounts of cooling water would improve the operational efficiency of LFTR reactors also and boost the performance to 48%+ efficiency. Improving operating efficiency impacts positively environmental impacts of the technology. If more of the Thorium nuclear fuel that you mine from the ground is actually burned and the heat generated is transformed into electricity then you do not have to mine as much ore to produce a given amount of electricity. If less fuel needs to be mined and the fuel is more completely utilized to produce electricity then you end up ultimately producing less waste to generate a given amount of electrical power.

    It is not necessary to give up large stretches of scenic rivers and coastline for siting of nuclear reactors as water for cooling is not required if you are willing to commercialize better high temperature nuclear and closed Brayton Cycle turbine technology.

    [1] LFTR Thorium Reactor Technology is good science.
    Dr. Edward Teller, the founding director of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, wrote a final paper one month before his death regarding the problems posed by running out of oil and gas supplies and the environmental problems that are due to greenhouse gases wherein he suggested the use of the energy available in the resource thorium, which is much more plentiful than the conventional nuclear fuel uranium. This was Dr. Teller’s final words on the topic of achieving energy independence while securing a sustainable abundant source of significantly less polluting nuclear energy.
    http://www.geocities.com/rmoir2003/moir_teller.pdf

    [2] Le Brun, C., “Impact of the MSBR concept technology on long lived radio toxicity and
    proliferation resistance”, Technical Meeting on Fissile Material Management Strategies for
    Sustainable Nuclear Energy, Vienna 2005
    http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/04/14/97/PDF/document_IAEA.pdf

    [3] “Comparison of Alternate Cooling Technologies for California Power Plants – Economic, Environmental and Other Tradeoffs” – California Energy Commission Report 500-02-079F (Feb. 2002)
    http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2002-07-09_500-02-079F.PDF

hi there! care to post a comment?

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our user conduct rules outlined in our terms of service.