The radius of curvature concept does not change any current math theories of physics, but ties them together for a far more comprehensible (gestalt/fractal)view, and subsequent application, of our micro/here&now/macro Realities
StarSteps Part one http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps1.pdf
StarSteps Part Two http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps2.pdf
StarSteps Part Three http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps3.pdf
http://www.fuel2000.net/
http://freedomtimes.blogspot.com
http://evolution-intelligentdesign-survival.blogspot.com
Evolution and Sustainable Survival on Earth are synonymous – their known parameters of the boundless wonders our Universe presents to us through the lenses of a free science is a Right of Freedom everywhere.
Since the 1940′s, new energy technologies have been available through the actual testing of Einstein’s incomplete but testable portions of his 1928 Unified Field theory.
StarSteps further expands and clarifies Einstein’s Unified Field Theory with the concept of the Radius Of Curvature Of All Natural Law. This did not change any of our mathematics, but dramatically changed the Interpretations contemporary science gave to Space, Time, Mass, Matter, Energy and Gravity – changed these factors to utter simplicity with extra ordinary application capacities.
As has been repeated constantly in these blog posts:
•In short, the quantity C is the measure of the radius of curvature of natural law. It is the factor which will enable us to determine precisely the degree of change in the curvature of one law which will be brought about by a specified change in the application of the others. It is the factor which will eventually tell us how to place our transport vehicles in either the positive or negative portion of the gravitational curve with respect to the earth or any other planet which we may choose to visit.
•
When we state that the quantity C is the radius of the curvature of natural law, we mean simply that if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.
While many may be apprehensive of the energy differential at the quantity C level (Einstein said the nuclear bomb was only a tiny fraction of the VC differential), electricity, the electrical nature of matter is always at that energy level, as the Theoretical explanation of the Biefeld-Brown Effect
suggests of the coupling between electricity and gravitation.
Review http://freedomtimes.blogspot.com/2010/01/its-musical-universe.html
Also, from StarSteps – The shape of the gravitational curve is modified not only by the mass present but also by the number and position of the electrical charges, referring not only to the charges in the outer shell of the atom but to those within as well, and especially to the fact, not always realized, that the neutron possesses both a positive and a negative charge, although when united within the neutron they are not discernible as charges, but exist as energy which produces the gravitational field. When a better understanding of the laws is acquired, we will be able to produce any shape of curve we desire within the variable and interdependent factors of space, time, mass, matter, energy, and gravity through the common denominator of vibration/frequency.
Further reading:
The Sustainable Technology Solution Revolution: A Universal Appeal by Brian O’Leary, Ph.D.,http://www.brianoleary.info/
On December 1st, 2010 at 12:31 pm Susanna, PF Web Maven Said:
This sounds interesting, but a little over my head. How would this idea change the way we think about or use energy?
On December 12th, 2010 at 7:18 pm Peter Jocis Said:
It is interesting to note the Cold Fusion Now post reflecting the history of energy evolution, contrasting the current “unnatural stagnant energy trend” that has continued for decades.
http://coldfusionnow.wordpress.com/2010/12/10/1976-edison-electric-institue-pamphlet Entitled The Transitional Storm -Or The Changing Energy Epoch, the four-page pamphlet has a brief history of human energy use, describing how each energy epoch has transitioned from one type of fuel to another somewhat smoothly, meaning that historically, humanity has been able to discover new forms of power generation and fuel before the previous technologies fuel ran out
In other words, we found coal before all the trees were burned. We found oil before all the coal was burned. However, they go on to say, “Today it is different.” The fossil-fuel epoch and the next age are not completely interlocking. There is also is a large supply-demand gap, and we call this gap a “transitional storm”-you’ve heard it called an “Energy Crisis.”
Response to Susanna’s question:
As scientist Brian O’Leary says, ‘the first step is to let go of our fears and become aware of the magnificent things that are possible”.
There exist hundreds of proofs of concepts of new energy devices, ranging from energy from the vacuum (zero point), cold fusion, and special hydrogen and water technologies, all which connect to an easily understood mathematical framework using the Quantity C as the Radius of Curvature of All Natural Law.
Understanding the Radius of Curvature concept permits anyone to know without a doubt that the following applications have long since been possible with our advances in science and technology:
• Field dependent propulsion
• Fields & Application of Anti-gravity – polarization of gravity
• Special hydrogen and water technologies, field related – instant cheap hydrogen for fuel cells
• FTL -faster than light transportation
• “Movement”/”Transference” – from one point to another without going through all points in between
• Transmutation of elements (Periodic Table application from one element to the next))
Even contemporary physicists have proposed that there might be some coupling between electricity and gravity repulsion at very high energies(or as Hawking said, a possible antigravitational effect from a supercooling phenomena) and are now using the Hadron Collider in an attempt to discover that which the energy differential of the quantity C radius already reveals:
• The QC is both the energy differential of velocity of light, and the total energy content of any quantity of matter converted to energy
• In other words, if we take a gram (or any other quantity of matter: Newtonian mass) and convert that matter gradually into energy according to the formula E = MC2, and the resultant energy, as it appeared, were constantly applied to the remaining matter in such a way as to accelerate it uniformly in a given direction, when all the matter had been so converted we would find that we had zero Newtonian mass, infinite inertial mass and a resultant velocity equal to the quantity C, or approximately 3×10(10) centimeters per second (with respect to the given reference or starting point). The maximum velocity attained would always be the same regardless of the quantity of matter with which we started.
The radius of curvature of all natural law quantified the radius to the energy differential of the speed of light, shedding insight to many of the mis-interpretations of the Theory of Relativity, i.e. as in:
• nothing goes faster than the speed of light
• when an object travels faster and faster, its mass increases
• time slows, stops, goes backwards – correspondingly when approaching, at, exceeding VC
• As an object approaches the speed of light its mass becomes infinite
The obvious subsequent realization of such narrow, mis-interpreted errors swiftly correct to – the ‘increasing mass’ of the target is only the measure of the kinetic energy differential which exists between them http://fuel2000.net
StarSteps excerpt: While we have repeatedly referred to the quantity C as an energy differential, we have heretofore considered it only in terms of kinetic energy. Some may believe that it can be reached only when there is a rate of increase or decrease in the degree of spatial separation between the reference points, equal to 3×10(10) centimeters per second, or in simpler terms, a velocity equal to that of light.
It is necessary therefore to point out the fact that an energy differential does not necessarily manifest itself as a velocity. It can also exist as a frequency. Our present laws of physics state that the energy level upon which an electron, a photon, or other particle exists is proportionate to its frequency. The mathematical rule is E equals Fh, where E is the energy, F is the frequency and h is a factor called Planck’s constant.
We can now see that a frequency differential which by the above formula is equal to 9×10(20) ergs per gram also represents the quantity C. When such a frequency differential exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, we again find that the natural laws at the observed point reach zero value with respect to the observer. If the frequency differential exceeds this value, the action of the laws will become negative. A material object such as a spacecraft upon or near the surface of the earth would cease to exist as matter and would enter the plane of energy insofar as the observer on earth was concerned, but as we have previously pointed out, an observer upon or within the object, whose frequency or energy level had been raised to the same degree as that of the craft, would be unable to detect any change.
Reference links:
• StarSteps Part one http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps1.pdf
• StarSteps Part Two http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps2.pdf
• StarSteps Part Three http://www.fuel2000.net/starsteps3.pdf
• http://www.fuel2000.net
• http://freedomtimes.blogspot.com
• http://evolution-intelligentdesign-survival.blogspot.com
• http://evolution-intelligentdesign-survival.blogspot.com/2010/01/its-musical-universe.html
Aside from the cold fusion, zero point, sympathetic vibratory physics and StarSteps pdf links provided in the original post, those interested in further exploration where the QC radius of curvature sheds credible insight:
• Dr Brian O’Leary – The Sustainable Technology Solution Revolution: http://www.brianoleary.info
• The New Energy Movement http://www.newenergymovement.org
• Cal Physics Institute – Zero Point Energy http://www.calphysics.org/index.html
• Cold Fusion http://coldfusionnow.org
• Dr Paul LaViolette (subquantum kinetics) http://etheric.com/LaVioletteBooks/Book-Secrets.html
• Shedding light on Walter Russell http://www.svpvril.com/musicuni.html
• Dr Thomas Valone http://www.integrityresearchinstitute.org/electrogravitics.html
• Heim’s Quantum Theory http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1680
• Vortex based mathematics (supporting sympathetic vibratory physics and Walter Russell) http://pesn.com/2010/10/23/9501714_Vortex_Based_Mathematics_at_TEDx_Charolette_by_Randy_Powell
Those who read StarSteps (explained in layman’s terms) will find the impossible is indeed theoretically & technologically very possible. (omitted) The only question remains, what is hampering Universities’ R&D besides corporate funding directions?
On February 12th, 2011 at 2:57 pm Peter Jocis Said:
The Promise of Energy for Everyone
A Power Point Introductory Presentation
(when power point opens click on ‘view’ then ‘slide show’ for best results)
http://www.relaxspa.net/TheRadiusOfCurvature12-28-10PPShow2003.pps
We have barely glimpsed the full scope of Energy Evolution and applications
A Timely Question
How long should America put its future on hold?
State of the Union key points summary from the White House
http://www.examiner.com/social-justice-in-national/state-of-the-union-key-points-summary-from-the-white-house
President Obama “I do not accept second-place for the United States of America”
Clearly innovation and education are in desperate need of upgrades. Corn for the next energy base, ladders to space, umbrellas to sheild earth from global warming, conserving the Infinite?? (i.e., energy), will not lead the world in new clean energy technologies
On November 3rd, 2011 at 12:10 pm douglas Said:
None of these ideas are his, they have been taken from the website, Daniel Fry dot com, Steps to the Stars. Now, if he were taking them and transforming them into new original ideas, a new kind of physics perhaps, then it would be great, but he is simple copying what Daniel Fry wrote 55yrs ago, almost word for word.
On November 5th, 2011 at 1:00 pm Equalizer Said:
What part of the poster‘s reference to “his mentor” did the above commenter not read or choose to ignore? What parts of simple common sense, yet still unrecognized and unacknowledged principles extending the definition and further applications of E=MC2 continues to be avoided and silenced? What parts of countless supporting documents, references and links, providing additional clarification to specific thought blocks of fundamental, “standard model” science with specifically referenced deficiencies to the “flat world” energy model of Physics, are repeatedly being unquestioned and avoided? What parts of these principles referenced are still not getting recognition, regardless of 55 years of stalemated energy physics?
I personally know the poster originally met his mentor decades prior to the dot.com site referred to, and after years of subsequent mentoring, received in writing, permission to promote, and even republish his works.
Freedom Times strikingly predicts, with overwhelming, leading scientific references and consensus, the direction our future is heading toward with continued stagnation of our energy definition and applications. The Wisdom and Understanding (and Applications) accompanying the expanded view of E=MC2, our expanding view to Reality, is a natural growth phenomena required for human survival. “Ostracizing”, “smear campaigns”, “look yonder” ruses to avoid reality, hoping that corn, radioactive waste, oil and greed will meet our energy needs and be a “shining example” of our future, will be devastating. http://freedomtimes.blogspot.com