Create. You can submit your idea or solution (preferably a video) around our questions about climate and energy challenges.
Vote. Help us choose the best ideas by rating their viability or discuss the ideas submitted by others. Get the FAQs.
Make it. Your ratings and comment help us decide which ideas are featured on our PBS TV Special. Learn how to make a video.
ActivismAdaptationAgricultureAlgaeArchitectureArtBikingBiofuelsBiomimicryBusinessCampus SustainabilityClean Tech
Climate ChangeEconomicsEducationEfficiencyElectric CarsEnergy StorageEngineeringEPA P3GeothermalGreen BuildingGreen CitiesGreen CommunitiesGreen Living
Planet Forward Original Webisodes
facebook
twitter
On January 28th, 2010 at 2:26 pm Fuzz Hogan Said:
That was cool to see Friedman answer my question. He seems to have gone a little further in his next column, offering great examples of science education. As he put it in the PF interview, we teach auto mechanics in career-tech ed, so we can teach green tech just as well. Here’s the column: http://bit.ly/6uiMOd
On January 29th, 2010 at 5:40 pm jstack6 Said:
policy is key but people have to just do the right thing. Don’t wait for government or incentives. It always pays to do the right thing.
I put in GRID tied solar before incentives and net-metering. It still paid off in 7 years. I then worked to get incentives, net-metering and am working on feed in tarriff.
I have a plugin prius w 10 Kw lithium battery pack and can go 30-40 miles all electric with the push of a button. As gas goes high again it will pay off very fast. I bicycle most days becuase it’s good for me and the planet.
On January 29th, 2010 at 11:08 pm Bill Zaffer Said:
I think I am going to talk to our high school in Elyria, Ohio to get kids to learn these ideas in new green shops.
On January 29th, 2010 at 11:45 pm Cliff Travis Said:
Frank – Great job on getting a seasoned author in there. I was dissapointed, however, that the interview didn’t run for at least 10-minutes. What was the rush? He could easily have answered half to all of the 16 questions posted without much more than about 20-minutes. Not to give you hard time, but once you’ve got someone like this as a captive audience, make the most of it.
On January 30th, 2010 at 3:07 am Robert Steinhaus Said:
Tilting the energy playing field by placing carbon taxes on all energy has consequences that Tom Friedman may not have completely thought through. Pricing up the cost of energy will have inflationary impacts on almost every product made or delivered to market with energy including food. By choosing to price up all energy to make a few highly subsidized but as yet underperforming wind and solar segments choosable will tend reduce the level of economic activity (everything will cost more – there is less money available to spread around and make other non-energy purchases – less confident consumers curtail spending and concentrate on essentials while paying down debt). If you tilt the playing field with carbon taxes making all energy more expensive the economic pie will shrink and less money will be available to pursue many worthwhile goals like wider access to quality education or wider access to all to quality medical care.
Tilting the energy playing field with large new carbon taxes is not a path to American prosperity. Prosperity comes from driving down the cost of energy to a cost below your industrial competition while expanding the number of people that have access to cheap and abundant energy and then using less costly energy to build world class products for export that people around the world want to buy.
On January 30th, 2010 at 5:09 am Bill Zaffer Said:
You forget the cost of going to war which increase our deficit and money for education and with every product being made in China and elsewhere the same economic viewpoints do not hold water. All we do is borrow more and more from China which is not reaching a tipping point. Maybe he may not totally wrong but I say compromise, have some offshore drilling and make them pay taxes since for far to long they have been subsidized. This time give tax incentives which can have social change and more for clean energy. I would also have the courage to talk about over population that is growing exponentially. We had 29 million more people added to our country by births and not net gain in employment from 2000 to 2008. We cannot keep up with this increase and at the same time have urban sprawl which uses up taxes for infrastructure for schools, fire departments etc. Urban sprawl and also is very energy wasteful and intensive with our lifestyles now. Will either party have talk honest debate. No, as usual since only care about their party power in Congress. I make a difference by living green and save money but am aware most people are just foolish consumers and slaves chasing less of the pie with the rich getting richer with 20% owning a larger amount of the wealth. We have become a winner take all society and their money influence has the day.
On January 30th, 2010 at 1:34 pm Susanna, PF Web Maven Said:
Cliff–Dont worry. More of this interview will be posted next week.