THIS WEEK: Have you ever wondered ‘What’s something I do everyday that impacts the environment and I don’t even know it?’
#Thinkfwd student Charles Pulliam-Moore sheds light on
an idea you might never have thought of: how green is YouTube?
FROM OUR BLOG: Check out PFF
Hayley Milon’s blog post about how your YouTube consumption could be affecting the atmosphere.
FROM OUR NEWSDESK: Facebook is already thinking about greening their servers.
Check out what their plan is for their massive server farm in Sweden.
FROM NBR: Tune in this week to the PBS Nightly Business Report to learn more about
Ogranica’s BlueHouse, which says it can turn your sewage into water you can use to water your plants!
Tags:
On November 17th, 2011 at 5:23 pm Sid Abma Said:
First, it’s about time that the coal fired power plants are converted to natural gas. Natural gas can be consumed to almost 100% efficiency if planned for.
Every power plant has chimney’s where millions of Btu’s are going up these chimney’s every minute as HOT exhaust into the atmosphere. We cant do much about that with coal or oil fired power plants, but with natural gas power plant the technology of Condensing Flue Gas Heat Recovery can be applied. What this technology does is transfer the energy that is in these waste exhaust gases into water. Now these exhaust gases are COOL and the water is a whole lot warmer.
Now what to do with this heated water?
Here is a thought. How about building a few hundred acres of greenhouses next to the power plant, or in the area of. These greenhouses can be heated and cooled with this heated water.
What can’t be grown in a controlled greenhouse environment? The world needs food, right? Fruits and vegetables of any variety can be grown. It needs people to take care of and harvest these crops, so now we are also putting a lot of people to work. These crops are not grown in the ground like field crops. They are grown on beds or benches so there is minimal bending over. And it does not matter what the weather is like outside, inside the greenhouse it is tropical weather.
All this product going out the doors would be good for the local economy.
And then there is the WATER. During this condensing heat recovery process, water is being created. This recovered water can be treated and used to irrigate the plants in the greenhouse.
Now that the exhaust gases have been cooled off this CO2 can be blown through out these greenhouses as fertilizer. Plants through the process of photosynthesis converts this CO2 into O2. So going out of the doors with the produce that was grown there is oxygen. And we all need that to maintain our next breath.
This is how efficient a natural gas power plant could be operated.
I would like to hear a few other thoughts. It makes these data farms a lot more friendly.
On November 18th, 2011 at 11:31 am Steve Said:
Why go after YouTube? If you really want to walk this walk, get off the Internet, start conserving and dump your Facebook page. What are we going to do? Ask the feds to regulate YouTube? You think that will save the planet? Don’t expect the government to save you.
Quit using so much power. Many of us think it is amusing to point the finger at YouTube when you have this giant Internet world wide network.
I see a lot of people preach to us how to live and point fingers at us for being on-line, but none of these quick-fix to climate change people are willing to stop using jets (jet fuel), SUV’s, YouTube, Plastic grocery shopping bags, cell phones, I-Phones, etc. etc, etc.
Instead they come up with science fiction solutions like 750 foot solar power towers that have never been tested and need natural gas backup to run.
Climate change seems to be a feel good cause to spoiled Americans who hoard the world’s resources. I have not met one climate change preacher who is willing to give up all the C02 intensive luxuries that life has to offer.
People come up with sexy one time ideas, but none of them seem to have what it takes to do what it will really take to reduce C02 emissions. Live with less. Go move to Panama or Costa Rica. They have very small power grids. They just don’t require as much as spoiled Americans. So how many of you are willing to live like that? But no where near as many of them have the Internet access that you all do.
So keep ragging on YouTube. That will save the Earth!! LOL! It’s about sacrifice. Stop talking about it and do it.
On November 21st, 2011 at 5:05 pm Susanna, PF Web Maven Said:
Steve -
One of cool things about the internet is that a lot of the computing power is in one place, so companies like YouTube, Facebook and Google can have a tremendous impact on GHG emissions by reducing the power needs of their servers and data centers.
Yes, people need to use less energy to avert climate change–some say efficiency could save up to 60% of our energy use if implemented on a wide scale. But, the problem isn’t with energy per ce–clean energy could help people improve their quality of life without the associated carbon pollution. Indeed, a lot more people need to get energy so that they can adapt to climate change.
Take air conditioning, for example. With climate change, it’s going to get hotter. People in the developing world need to get access to air conditioning if they are going to survive heat waves. If that air conditioning is powered by dirty energy, they’re contributing to the problem of global warming. But, I don’t think they should be asked to sacrifice air conditioning because of global warming.
In the U.S., there’s certainly more of an argument that solving climate change is about sacrifice, but unless there are policy incentives that encourage that sacrifice, I don’t think personal action is going to get us the kind of changes we need.
Thanks for your comment.
On July 2nd, 2012 at 7:30 pm video traffic academy download Said:
I’ve read some good stuff here. Certainly worth bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how a lot attempt you place to make such a wonderful informative website.