Just tweaking what we do now will not work. My idea is to start over with a franchised city plan and grow the cities of the future like an organism. It is impossible for me to put what I’ve been working on into just one of these categories. There is not just one thing that will fix the mess we are in. We need to compact our metropolitan areas. We need walkable cities.
My plan would set a maximum city size of 50,000. And I would put everything that the city needed within a nine mile square, with residential, commercial, and institutional structures occupying the central square mile. That means that everyone would live no more than a mile from anywhere. The first city would be started by subscription of 20,000 to 25,000 individuals who purchase a single share of stock in the city franchise. The name of this city would be Adastra Prime.
Once the subscription process was complete, a site would be chosen in a rural area of a low population state like Kansas. Necessary for the plan to work would be easements for an elevated railway line which would follow an established roadway to the nearest metropolitan area. When the city was built and occupied additional subscriptions and residents would be solicited. Some might sell their interest and move elsewhere while new residents move in. It would be a dynamic population. There would be manufacturing, agriculture, hospitals, schools, a university or college, a sports arena, retail and commercial enterprises, all owned or leased by the franchise, and thus owned by all the residents. There would be only one ironclad rule, every stockholder in the franchise would also need to be a resident on a franchise holding.
At some point before the “magic” 50,000 residents level is achieved, there would be a second property purchased and subscriptions would be taken for a new city, to be linked to the first city by a raised high-speed rail line and following the same plan as Adastra Prime. The new city would be called Adastra II. There would be no developments other than agricultural, waste water recycling, and energy harvesting allowed in the zones around the cities. All high maintenance roadways would be decommissioned in the areas controlled by the cities. Everyone would have their own green space, as well as common “greenways,” and green spaces would be scattered throughout the city. No one would need a car because the cities would be walkable, there would be personal transports when walking was not practical or for handicapped or elderly residents. A pneumatic delivery system would handle transport of goods to each business and residence. There is no need to wait for some enabling technology. These cities could be built today.
On June 16th, 2011 at 10:06 pm Charles Marsh Said:
I have a blog with some sketches of my city, if anyone is interested.
http://adastra-future-city.blogspot.com/
-cmm
On June 20th, 2011 at 1:11 pm Carrie Winans Said:
While this idea seems idyllic to me, it does not seem like something that is achievable. How are you going to convince people to uproot their lives that they are comfortable living for a chance to start over? Will they be stipened? Taxed less? It seems far fetched. Especially since there won’t be any initial trust in something new like this. How would people be able to trust that the schools and universities would be of good quality?
Further more, I’m confused as to how the people would get food and remove waste. Both are HUGE energy products! Feeding 50,000 people would take a lot of energy if done within the city. That’s a lot of land for wheat to grow, cattle to graze, and chickens to roam. If you’re planning on importing this food, the energy problem really wouldn’t be decreased. For waste, would you recycle and composte? That smells after awhile. Where would you place a dump?
On June 30th, 2011 at 11:56 pm Charles Marsh Said:
Hi Carrie,
Nearly 300 years ago my ancestors left the British Isles for life on an unknown, wild, and dangerous continent called America. Truth is if you are perfectly happy with two hour commutes to your place of work, don’t worry about your children running the gauntlet of fast moving traffic while trying to bike to school, or just love the smell of smog in the morning, I imagine you would not be interested in my venture.
The economics begin to make more sense when you look at what you are cutting out of everyone’s budget. First on that list is the automobile. With no roads, easy public transport, and everything within walking distance, you have no use for them. Think about saving everything you spend on your car and then transfer those funds back into your bank account; or better, transfer those funds to an income earning property. You have now begun the transformation from owning property that costs you something to owning property that earns income. No roads means no road maintenance, so there is no need for taxes to build or maintain roads. That is just an example.
The whole venture is run as a company where everyone owns their own share of every business and income earning property on site. This is not communal, but corporate ownership. More later….
Charles Marsh
Check this out:
http://www.masdar.ae/en/Menu/index.aspx?MenuID=48&CatID=27&mnu=Cat
Designed by Norman Foster
On July 13th, 2011 at 11:20 pm Charles Marsh Said:
One of the most important construction feature of this city is modularity. Everything within the city is constructed from steel framework modules similar iin size to a shipping container. Six frame modules (10 feet wide, 7.5 feet tall and 40 feet long) go together to make a single building unit (30 feet wide, 15 feet tall, and 40 feet long).
This allows for the construction of an appartment module with all servicees enclosed within the upper section of the module (about three feet) with the upper two feet reserved for earth fill.
-cmm