Create. You can submit your idea or solution (preferably a video) around our questions about climate and energy challenges.
Vote. Help us choose the best ideas by rating their viability or discuss the ideas submitted by others. Get the FAQs.
Make it. Your ratings and comment help us decide which ideas are featured on our PBS TV Special. Learn how to make a video.
On January 23rd, 2011 at 8:29 pm Alex J Said:
I hear Exxon invests some in removing impurities, including CO2, from natural gas (apparently a sort of quality control), and pats themselves on the back about it, but that apparently doesn’t much change the combustion carbon footprint of the fuel. Perhaps overall, the proof is in the pudding. How about a look at what percentage of the fuel supply is renewable (present and projected for the next decade), and the ratio of investment in fossil fuel production (including carbon-intensive tar sands) vs. low-carbon energy? I suspect they probably know that with today’s usage levels (and no real impetus yet to wean ourselves off of subsidized oil), even marginal fossil fuel sources remain a more viable investment.
On January 27th, 2011 at 3:16 pm Susanna, PF Web Maven Said:
@alexj – True, but if we removed the billions in subsidies we give to the fossil fuel industry, like Obama proposed in his SOTU, then at least we’d start leveling the playing field. We’ll try to track down those numbers for you…
Thanks for your comment!
Susanna